Washington's mix is still overwhelmingly hydro-led.
In 2025, hydro provided nearly two-thirds of the main generation lines tracked on the page. Gas, wind, and nuclear formed the next tier, while coal and solar were both much smaller.
Washington is not a generic Western transition case. The state's annual generation totals are dominated by hydro, nuclear still matters, gas remains the main thermal balancing line, and coal had already become small before collapsing in the January 2026 monthly data.
Washington's page should be read as a hydro state first. Coal is part of the story mainly because its final decline helps show how little coal the system still needs when hydro, nuclear, gas, and wind are all already in the mix.
In 2025, hydro provided nearly two-thirds of the main generation lines tracked on the page. Gas, wind, and nuclear formed the next tier, while coal and solar were both much smaller.
Coal is no longer a large generation block in Washington. The important analytical question now is whether the final coal output disappears cleanly while the rest of the system keeps running strongly, which the January 2026 numbers strongly suggest.
Washington coal generation fell from 5,053 thousand MWh in 2015 to 3,160 thousand MWh in 2025, a decline of about 37%. The more important signal now is that January 2026 coal generation fell to just 2 thousand MWh.
| Plant | Coal role | Timing | Transition context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralia Unit 2 | Last large remaining Washington coal unit | DOE issued a section 202(c) emergency order on December 16, 2025 to keep the unit available through March 16, 2026. | Washington coal generation fell from 432 thousand MWh in January 2025 to 2 thousand MWh in January 2026, which suggests the unit may have stayed technically available without contributing meaningful generation. |
Through April, Washington coal is down to almost nothing, gas is sharply lower, and hydro is much higher than it was at the same point in 2025.
| Item | Type | Status | Timing | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Generating Station | Nuclear | Operating | 7,749 GWh in 2025 | Washington remains unusual because its non-hydro clean backbone still includes a meaningful nuclear block. |
| Hydro system | Conventional hydro | Dominant in-state generation base | 65,170 GWh in 2025 | Hydro is the central reason Washington reads differently from Arizona and New Mexico in both annual totals and monthly swings. |
| Utility-scale solar | Solar | Still small but rising | 366 GWh in 2023 to 628 GWh in 2025 | Solar is not yet a defining Washington line, but it has moved out of the near-zero zone and now belongs on the chart. |
The page uses repo-local EIA generation exports as the quantitative baseline and adds curated context only where it sharpens the Washington-specific interpretation.
Return to the regional view and compare Washington's hydro-led structure with Arizona's gas-and-nuclear mix and New Mexico's wind-heavy profile.
Open Western Grid