Washington

Washington's power mix is hydro-dominant, while coal fades toward zero.

Washington is not a generic Western transition case. The state's annual generation totals are dominated by hydro, nuclear still matters, gas remains the main thermal balancing line, and coal had already become small before collapsing in the January 2026 monthly data.

Lead chart

How Washington's generation mix is changing

Washington's page should be read as a hydro state first. Coal is part of the story mainly because its final decline helps show how little coal the system still needs when hydro, nuclear, gas, and wind are all already in the mix.

Washington annual generation by fuel
Annual view
Hydro
Gas
Wind
Nuclear
Coal
Solar
0k21k43k64k85kHydro still dominatesCoal is now small20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Washington's chart looks unlike Arizona or New Mexico: hydro is the major line, gas is important but secondary, nuclear still matters, and coal sits near the bottom of the stack by 2025.Source: EIA Electricity Data Browser
2025 hydro generation
65,170 GWh
2025 gas generation
16,296 GWh
2025 coal generation
3,160 GWh
2025 snapshot

Washington's mix is still overwhelmingly hydro-led.

In 2025, hydro provided nearly two-thirds of the main generation lines tracked on the page. Gas, wind, and nuclear formed the next tier, while coal and solar were both much smaller.

Interpretation

Washington's coal story matters mainly because it is nearly over.

Coal is no longer a large generation block in Washington. The important analytical question now is whether the final coal output disappears cleanly while the rest of the system keeps running strongly, which the January 2026 numbers strongly suggest.

Pressure point

Coal is shrinking in annual terms and collapsing in the monthly data.

Washington coal generation fell from 5,053 thousand MWh in 2015 to 3,160 thousand MWh in 2025, a decline of about 37%. The more important signal now is that January 2026 coal generation fell to just 2 thousand MWh.

Washington coal generation, 2015 to 2025
Long-run coal trend
Coal
0k3k5k8k10k2015: 5,0532025: 3,16020152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Washington coal generation fell from 5,053 to 3,160 thousand MWh between 2015 and 2025, but the sharper signal may be the near-disappearance of coal in January 2026.Source: EIA Electricity Data Browser
Remaining Washington coal

Centralia is now the key coal-transition case.

PlantCoal roleTimingTransition context
Centralia Unit 2Last large remaining Washington coal unitDOE issued a section 202(c) emergency order on December 16, 2025 to keep the unit available through March 16, 2026.Washington coal generation fell from 432 thousand MWh in January 2025 to 2 thousand MWh in January 2026, which suggests the unit may have stayed technically available without contributing meaningful generation.
2026 so far

Year-to-date 2026 reinforces Washington's coal collapse and hydro rebound.

Through April, Washington coal is down to almost nothing, gas is sharply lower, and hydro is much higher than it was at the same point in 2025.

Year-to-date 2026 versus 2025 generation by fuel
Washington, Jan-Apr, thousand MWh
Jan-Apr 2025
Jan-Apr 2026
0k8k16k23k31kHydroGasCoalWindSolar
Through April, Washington hydro is up about 8.8 TWh, gas is down about 2.5 TWh, and coal is down about 1.0 TWh from the same 2025 period.Source: EIA Electricity Data Browser
What stands out

The YTD signal is clearer than the annual one.

  • Jan-Apr 2026 coal generation was 6 thousand MWh versus 1,046 thousand MWh in Jan-Apr 2025.
  • Gas fell to 2,717 thousand MWh from 5,243 thousand MWh.
  • Hydro rose to 30,897 thousand MWh from 22,075 thousand MWh, reinforcing how hydro-heavy Washington's system still is.
State structure

What still shapes Washington's power story

ItemTypeStatusTimingWhy it matters
Columbia Generating StationNuclearOperating7,749 GWh in 2025Washington remains unusual because its non-hydro clean backbone still includes a meaningful nuclear block.
Hydro systemConventional hydroDominant in-state generation base65,170 GWh in 2025Hydro is the central reason Washington reads differently from Arizona and New Mexico in both annual totals and monthly swings.
Utility-scale solarSolarStill small but rising366 GWh in 2023 to 628 GWh in 2025Solar is not yet a defining Washington line, but it has moved out of the near-zero zone and now belongs on the chart.
Method

How this page is built

The page uses repo-local EIA generation exports as the quantitative baseline and adds curated context only where it sharpens the Washington-specific interpretation.

Back to Western Grid

Return to the regional view and compare Washington's hydro-led structure with Arizona's gas-and-nuclear mix and New Mexico's wind-heavy profile.

Open Western Grid